Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Bill

Thomas M.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1306994)

7/8/2021 1:49:43 PM

From: Broken_Clock

2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1582681

You truly are demented. Is your drug of choice Xanax or Prozac or something stronger? You should show your doctor your posts in SI. He'll have you committed immediately. then you'll have access to some really good drugs.

zzbru:
"The DOJ isn't withholding evidence. They're using to arrest the anti-American terrorists."

Truth:

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1306894)	7/7/2021 8:29:04 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) of 1306998

zzbru...champion of fascists! msn.com "Prosecutors have relied on surveillance footage to bolster their case against McCaughey, and typical evidence-sharing procedures would require prosecutors to share those videos with McCaughey's defense team. However, the Capitol Police are raising alarms about sharing surveillance footage with McCaughey or in hundreds of other cases where such footage could come into play. DiBiase said that the agency's legally authorized policy is to sharply restrict access to such videos because it could be used by bad actors — including many of the alleged insurrectionists now facing charges — to map out the interior of the Capitol and pose a future threat to lawmakers. "The Department has significant concerns with the release of any of its footage to defendants in the Capitol attack cases unless there are safeguards in place to prevent its copying and dissemination," DiBiase said. "Our concern is that providing unfettered access to hours of extremely sensitive information to defendants who have already shown a desire to interfere with the democratic process will result in the layout, vulnerabilities and security weaknesses of the Capitol being collected, exposed and passed on to those who might wish to attack the Capitol again," he said. Prosecutors are pointing to DiBiase's affidavit as they attempt to craft a so-called "protective order" governing the sharing of sensitive information with Capitol riot defendants"

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next