2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 396.31

-0.6%

Dec 31 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

maceng2

Maple MAGA

SirWalterRalegh

To: carranza2 who wrote (174594)	7/11/2021 3:23:55 AM
From: sense	3 Recommendations of 218883

A couple of things... You repeat "in a small percentage of cases" over and over... as if that is all and only what is possible ? Why ? That leads into the next... which is that you assume that all the risks are fully known ? Why ? Not in yours... but in reality... there are known risks... that people getting the vaccines are NOT being told about... ? Why ? And, last... Please note that the vaccines would have never been approved if ... You need to note carefully... THEY HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED... They have been issued an emergency exemption from approval... by the same people who lied to you repeatedly about things like masks being unnecessary (because they wanted the masks for themselves)... and then changed to say it was critically important for you to comply with mandated masking requirements... using masks that don't work ? The same people pushing vaccines... when there are small drugs that prevent viral replication... which under the rules... require using the drugs... not making vaccines ? They are still "experimental medicines"... and NOT vaccines... BY DEFINITION... in two different ways... There is now mounting pressure to approve them... not because they have met any of the criteria to be approved... but because... politics... much like the disastrous recent approval of a new Alzheimer's drug... which NONE of the science reviewers had agreed should be approved... You trust them... in spite of SERIAL PROOFS they should not be trusted ? Why ? I'm also not opposed to the "idea" of a proper immunization... but know full well that is not what is on offer. I think "they" represent a vastly larger risk to me... than the virus does... But, the "position on the line" from which I observe this imbroglio... might give me a different view of it... ?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next