| | | <<THERE IS NO FCUKING MAGIC OF PRAYER... It is an illusion for the deluded>>
Remember anyone can be wrong, including oneself. I can be wrong, but I take my chances with what I can discern. Many scientists, some of the very best in fact, are religious, even deeply religious.
These ancient Indians believe (not believed) that the word "intent" is a thing, not a concept. It's like air, you just can’t see it.
Watch this little sampler, I helped fund it btw.
(420) The Spot (Carlos Castaneda) | HD TRAILER | 2018 - YouTube
and the scientific proof to prove "intent" is just a word in the dictionary is where?
So pick up a religious book of choice, Bible, Koran, I am sure there are lots of others and get started. Maybe some different aspects to life could be comprehended ? A common saying... where there is a will, there is a way? Wonder where that came from ?
These religious books are all about one basic concept imho. For whatever reason(s) human beings are challenged in ways that cannot be fully explained. Certainly not by just words in a book, or by the words of a person. They are a guide for a path that can be chosen to be walked.
So there are grounds to say that your universal declaration that praying "does nothing" is open to be challenged.
I like science. It blasts away all sorts of crapola, but it has very defined limits. There is an innate weakness in science in that it is arrogant, and at times arrogant beyond belief. It's scope is limited to only that that can be proved to all human beings, a strict common denominator. That very narrow "common denominator" can be used as a belief that defines the universe in itself, is a silly one imho. It's a good conjecture to proceed with science, but that conjecture is like a tool, like an axe or a hammer. It's another vast jump to assume that science (the very temporary knowledge to date, to be revised at any moment) defines ones existence.
There are also people who believe popular utterances on Covid in the newspapers and announcements by politicians is also "science". It isn't. It called bull chit... plain and simple.
bwdik.
Oh and since when has censoring the news (and the data) been part of the scientific process?
You seen this?
Coronavirus - Covid 19 Information Sharing Forum Message Board - Msg: 33393077 (siliconinvestor.com)
By Dr David Martin? It's all about science and patents going back before year 2000. It leaves the very best scientific minds in the audience aghast.
It's a doozy.
I certainly would like to hear the counter arguments, in the newspapers, the Tee Vee, and by our politicians to painstaking explain, scientifically, how and where Dr David Martin and others are wrong.
and Ivor Cummings too -g- |
|
