The development of highly effective vaccines may have led many people to believe that once vaccinated, COVID-19 posed little threat to them.
That's totally a lie.. "The development... of vaccines" did not lead anyone to believe any of that. That belief was propagated, on purpose, by officialdom... who knew at the outset that the vaccinations did not confer immunity... but communicated that they did... both in words, directly, and in policy assuming it was true.
I posted that here, repeatedly... that the science gave no reason to expect immunity from the jab, that they knew it did NOT provide immunity when they created it... and I pointed out the error in the propaganda as it began being fostered
"When the vaccines were first developed, nobody was thinking that they were going to prevent infection," said Carlos del Rio, a professor of medicine and infectious disease epidemiology at Emory University in Atlanta. The aim was always to prevent severe disease and death, del Rio added.
Just so... So, how did that KNOWLEDGE in SCIENCE FACT translate into policy that was the OPPOSITE in expectation given what was known ?
And, why did none of the public health officials... object to the obviousness of the error as it was imposed ?
Denmark is not smelling so good...
It appears as Occam's Razor says: that public health officials wanted the virus to continue to spread... so knowingly adopted policy to ensure it did... perhaps to force compliance on those un-vacinated who had defied their orders... by using the vaccinated population to sustain the virus and make it endemic ?
Why would they want that ? And, if you aren't asking that question... you're not paying close enough attention to what is going on the world today...
The alternative.... is that they are all that wildly incompetent... that they cannot connect simple dots... making them a FAR greater threat to us now, and in the future, than the virus has proven to be...
But, in any case... PROVING that you cannot be trusted... isn't likely to foster greater compliance ?
. The vaccines were so effective, however, that there were signs they also prevented transmission against prior coronavirus variants.
Total fabrication... you can't see "signs" of prevented transmission... basically, ever... certainly not at the outset within a partially naturally immune population... and, particularly not before there is actually any potential for there to be data generated ?
The more likely story... is that in the vid linked by Armstrong... showing that natural immunity was already kicking in throughout the population... .
That happening will mean other things, too... as the natural immunity in the population is likely responsible for a large portion of the "benefit" claimed by those selling the jab as useful...
It requires all of that to be recalculated... prior to being able to validate a benefit versus risk...
It would also explain why such a relatively high proportion of Delta variant cases are among the already vaccinated... as you would otherwise assume the residual and overlaps in protection from the vaccine would vastly reduce the numbers of cases being reported among the vaccinated... if symptoms were sufficiently suppressed that people got infected without feeling the impacts...
Without knowing what portion of the un-vaccinated have already been exposed and developed some natural immunity with long term anti-body responses... its not really possible to develop a proper public health strategy... or make proper comparisons in risks and outcomes...
It is clear that spike proteins are NOT GOOD FOR YOU... and thus should not be used in fostering immune responses... when they can AS EASILY be invoked by OTHER proteins that don't have the health risks.
Co-opting RNA functions to have cells in the body produce viral proteins as a "self generated vaccine"... is a MASSIVE FAIL... a failed experiment... and one for which there was never any scientific basis for expecting it would do anything other than fail...
And, for that, there should be public accountability... |
