| | | Note how your own (controlled opposition) source fails to consider ANY of what actually matters ?
Americans believe 2 completely different Jan. 6 narratives. Neither one is right.
And, while she isn't wrong in her analysis re "neither one is right" in terms of the arguments she presents... those arguments are not a fair representation of reality or the truth. She's also very clearly bending over backwards in order to ensure leaving the truth out of the matter, on purpose, by claiming in regard to what is true: "I don't know exactly what " ? The effort made is wildly dishonest, in context as "Either way, if our conversations around Jan. 6 are held in bad faith"... being left dangling ?
LOL !!!
What you should note, in all of the coverage... is a lot of ad hominem... and ZERO discussion of ANY of what the protest on January 6th was actually ABOUT ?
Democracy... is not advanced by hand-waving past systemic election fraud... ?
Yet, that is exactly what happened in the 2020 election... pure, deliberate, systemic FRAUD...
Everyone knows it... Biden didn't win an election he conducted from his basement. Trump's throngs of supporters... didn't lose the vote to the 10 people who showed up for Biden's speeches in Florida parking lots... It's so obvious its a joke...
More than 60% of Americans believed that to be true... at the time. Nothing has changed, since then, to change their minds, or shift that proportion toward anything but "more" ?
Except... the media have new orders to banish any discussion of the truth... which is exactly what you see in that linked article... an author who knows the truth... but won't speak the WHOLE truth rather than awkwardly avoid it... because we don't have a free press anymore...
This is OK, though: "it seems safe to assume the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have extensive, open-ended, very possibly unconstitutional new programs purring into action to surveil, infiltrate, and manipulate the lives and organizations of people"... "that proceeds in secret"...because that is intended as a threat being sent ? "Safe" to assume... meaning the opposite ? Because... they were already doing that before the LAST election... which has already been quite well exposed... although no one has been held properly accountable for those PROVEN violations of citizens rights, and the law... as the FBI bent over backwards trying to help elect Hillary ? Hmmm.
How many people were there, in Washington, on January 6th... and what were they there to protest ?
Those there on January 6th KNOW. And, they can't be lied to, now... to make them NOT know... ?
Once you've seen the truth of it... you can't unsee it. The author clearly knows... yet feels compelled to lie, and pretend to not know what it was about ? No one is "allowed" to speak about the FACT of election fraud ? Only by lying about that FACT... and refusing to talk about it... can you hope to sell the fraud of "not knowing what it really means" ?
Americans WILL NOT allow SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD to become the "basis" on which a crazy minority of Marxists posing as Democrats conducts a coup... expecting they will be able to dictate the future of the Republic... based on "getting away" with that obvious practice of fraud they've been caught fully engaged in, and caught red-handed.
Not gonna happen... That's what January 6th means. And, those who reject that message ?
The author is also correct that January 6th was not "the last of it"...
But, the effort now being made labeling those who know the truth of the election fraud that was perpetrated... as terrorists... for objecting to the fraud and speaking the truth about it ?
Yeah. That's not going to work either.
Why is it... that Democrats are OBSTRUCTING investigations of the fraud ?
It doesn't matter... the audits will continue... The PROOF will be provided...
And, there WILL BE accountability...
Note, the STUPIDITY of the pro-fraud argument... not anything new, but the same as long as I've been aware of it... has always been that it is SO DANGEROUS to allow people to think that the elections might be fraudulent... that we have to tolerate the "low level" of fraud that there is... to avoid risks to legitimacy... rather than speak about it... or do anything to prevent the fraud ?
In any case, that dog won't hunt no more. Legitimacy has been LOST because "enabling the fraud".
Occupied Washington... living on borrowed time... as well as borrowed money...
Change is coming.
People no longer believe there is no fraud. Instead, they KNOW, and see the proofs, that there is MOSTLY fraud... and not just in elections, but in that, the fraud is not "low level" or "voter fraud"... rather than COORDINATED, SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD... that is fostered in order to determine outcomes that are the OPPOSITE of what people actually voted for...
And, I will agree that people knowing that FACT... IS dangerous...
But, the danger TRUTH represents... is not a danger to the Republic... or to the Constitution... but a danger to the TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION who have been enabling the fraud...
Calling those who insist on election integrity... racists and terrorists ? LOL !!! Good luck with that.
It is a TINY minority... the party of the most corrupt... who think election fraud is a good idea...
The media... cannot stop what is coming... But, as is true in markets... inevitability is not a control applied on the timing of events ?
Don't take others word for it. Study it for yourself... to determine the truth. And, then...
Wait for it...
|
|
