I don't profess to know what the truth is, but I do know some things need investigated.
I know the truth about those things where I've gone out of my way to discover the truth... and know what I know from first hand experience. Election fraud would be pretty high on that list of things I know are a problem... that those creating the problem are very quick to deny could possibly be a problem.
Other issues... might obviously suffer some overlaps... as you probably shouldn't trust the SAME people you know are lying to you about election fraud... to make decisions about what will be REQUIRED to be injected into you... ? If you lack an adequate instinct for self-preservation... you won't find me arguing against the idea that "Darwin was right" ?
But, as it happens, I also have a few parallel skills in the biological sciences... and experience enough with the bureaucracy to know some of how it operates... That doesn't substitute for direct knowledge... but, it might work to help refine that sense of " I do know some things need investigated"...
I read... the next story about Biden on CNN.
Biden: "Your decision to be unvaccinated impacts someone else. Unvaccinated people spread the virus"... "Before Biden made his remarks, deputy White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters "until we have more people who are vaccinated and are curbing the spread"...
Except, the whole point of what we've learned recently... is the OPPOSITE... that it is vaccinated people who are spreading the virus... not the un-vaccinated. And, that's not new news ?
Why are they lying about that ? Why did they lie... and continue to lie... by saying the vaccine "curbs the spread"... when that was known to be untrue when the vaccine came out... it provides ZERO immunity... and its known now to be the opposite case... that the vaccine facilitates the spread... increases viral titre in the vaccinated... and vastly accelerates the rate of mutation into new variants... because it does nothing at all to prevent infection... gives NO immunity. NONE !
You can't believe anything they say... which doesn't change at all as they become more insistent ?
But back to an older story that didn't get aired much in the USA. I was trying to remember something from pre covid days,,, finally I realised I posted this weird tale back in March 2019 on S.I. Tony Fauchi was a big deal on HIV some time ago, I don't know in what way... but maybe that needs a little further research now. In the light of developments over the last two years.
The first link... about AIDS... I stopped the moment he mentioned Ebola. I know a bit about that... from riding herd closely on the last significant outbreaks. It was the rapid adoption of my own inputs that is what stopped the Ebola outbreak in West Africa... just as it was spiraling out of control and exceeding the capacity of the systems to contain it...
Guess what it was that "they" required must be the only acceptable "solution" to the problem of Ebola... back then... during that last serious risk of an uncontrolled outbreak ?
And, in the last link, they're even taking the credit for vaccines... that didn't exist... having contained it ?
January 2018: Ebola Virus Disease and Ebola Vaccines
December 2019: First FDA-approved vaccine for the prevention of Ebola virus disease, marking a critical milestone in public health preparedness and response
April 2021: The need for a new strategy for Ebola vaccination
June 2021: Vaccines could make big Ebola outbreaks a thing of the past
Note, not a mention, anywhere in there, what it was that DID contain the Ebola outbreak in West Africa ?
Why won't they tell you about that ? It's a brilliant story... except for the really embarrassing part about "some guy on the internet" solving a simple problem none of them could... as it didn't involve a vaccine ?
Otherwise...another instance proving, as occurs repeatedly, that the skepticism is warranted...
I'll agree that there is an unmet need in forensics being applied to the evolution of the AIDs genome... and that the nature of the concern expressed is not unwarranted... given they've proven capable of it before...
On The Variety article and Dag Hammarskjold...
A compelling story is not hard to create by connecting dots to form linkages between disparate narratives. It's why Hollywood exists ? Every whodunit has to have enough active threads to leave most people guessing right to the end ? But, given the overlapping topics... my natural inclination in considering conspiracies would be to expect that few are ever realized that don't have a multiplicity of overlapping drivers in interest... rather than a multiplicity of overlapping elements in execution. So, when the story isn't about multiple explanations, each of which makes sense out of one event... but about a single explanation which is being stretched to make supposed sense of multiple events... I'd tend to be skeptical...
Except... that's what you would do... if you were seeking to cover up the real motives and actors and multiple explanations in overlapping interest for each of those events... by stringing them together... with a disconnect between the real motives and actors... and the putative perp selected as a scapegoat ?.
Dag Hammerskjold might well have been targeted and shot down... for the reasons stated in relation to his activism, in relation to his efforts countering someone's colonial interests... which a proper investigation might seek to extend into... others with similar interests who might benefit from cooperation in such a scheme... for similar reasons ? As in every such interest... the means are a sharply narrowing limiter... as most people will not own airplanes and skill sets making them capable of shooting down other airplanes ? I'd probably not tend to extend my curiosity far beyond "who else" and "how"...
AIDS... gives plenty of reasons to be suspicious about its origins... The insanity of those with an excess of interest in imposing element of eugenics as a solution to problems... doesn't really require you to wander too far... before encountering similarly narrowing limits in "who" and "who else" and "how"... again with the esoteric means not leaving you with a world full of suspects ?
Continue thinking in that vein... in each instance... and then, perhaps, in searching for an appropriate scapegoat... if you were wanting to deflect attention from more likely and still extant choices of potential perpetrators... why wouldn't you go with... the only one you might plausibly blame... that doesn't actually exist any more ? And, given all the effort made recently in villainizing fictitious white supremacists... why not pick out a real one... in order to extend some indirect validation of their continuing existence ?
The response... that it's not possible to spread HIV using a vaccine. Sure... infected HIV needles don't exist. All that evidence, the Ace of Spades card... everything ... is just co incidental.
I'd note... it is not a coincidence that the evidence has been gathered in the pile that it has... to be presented as it has... whether that makes a lick of sense or not ? The correlation of disparate bits of evidence of one thing or another... is a separate act... that doesn't, in itself, create any evidence of the correlation relating the causation in one instance... to the causation in another: Take three rapes all occurring in the same city... find some hapless patsy to pin them on... close the books and call it good ?
But, I'm not discounting that AIDS might well have been manufactured in order to enable a "secretly conducted" genocide... the casual approach of a lot of African cultures to homosexuality would have made that an obvious enough approach to the task...
Kind of suprised that none of the "Black Lives Matter" and such like groups have not picked up on this, it tells me they could be a bunch of phonies.
Yeah, they are phonies... screaming about racism that doesn't exist in the way they claim... in order to con people into submitting themselves to slavery, again, in the form of being "the property of the state"... as socialism intrinsically requires you must agree to... White slave owners in the U.S. and in the rest of the world... weren't the only ones involved in the slave trade ? They were actually late arrivals... in a long running trade in slaves conducted between Africans... and Arabs. The slaves were sold into slavery... by other Africans. They were taken as prisoners of war and sold into slavery... or they were troublemakers being banished from the kingdom... at a profit. And there are a lot of Africans today... who'd love to have that kind of power... and would gladly lie, cheat and steal to get it... which is not a thing unique to lieberal white people ?
Walter Williams Editorial: Blacks' biggest enemy is a white liberal
There are no former members of the KKK in the Republican Party... for a reason...
[url=https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism-msna305591]Lyndon Johnson was a civil rights hero. But also a racist.[/url]
Did LBJ Say ‘I’ll Have Those N*****s Voting Democratic for 200 Years’?
Just noted this story too, is fresh up on utube.
(493) VIRAL RANT: Ted Cruz unloads on Nancy Pelosi, CDC over new mask mandates - YouTube
One of Ted's better rants... but, note... it repeatedly points out he BELIEVES "the science"... because the science says that vaccines protect you ? That's what vaccines do ?
They're going to FORCE them to admit... the "vaccine" doesn't provide ANY protection against infection... because its not a vaccine... and that they KNEW IT DIDN'T when they said it did... ? The liability waivers will still cover the drug companies risks... as they didn't lie about it... but it won't cover those risks for the policy makers who KNOWINGLY pushed policies that they LIED ABOUT ? Immunity... is not a result of getting the Covid "vaccine"... but it also doesn't extend to knowing and deliberate acts of malfeasance ? |
