If the Biden, the CDC and Congress don't have to follow the Constitution in imposing Covid policies...
Neither does anyone else need to follow their guidance... the law... or the Constitution ?
Florida's Gov should mandate:
1. The "flatten the curve" emergency is long since over. Every person offered an experimental medicine, or any medicine that has ever been the subject of an emergency use authorization, must be fully informed about 1. the known risks, and must be provided sufficient information, in writing, and verbally, to enable FULLY INFORMED consent, including full information about all known risks, and 2. all suspected or reasonably foreseeable risks, 3. all known existing alternative courses of treatment, with direction to consider their risks as they are revealed in those alternatives similar disclosures, and 4. the potential for future options with lesser risks, with information as may exist about sources of information and the providers working to enable them. Subjects must provide WRITTEN informed consent before taking any experimental medicine... or any formerly authorized under any emergency use authorization. Employers requiring employees to take experimental medicines can do so only with fully voluntary compliance... it cannot be required as a condition of employment... and, then, even with voluntary compliance, the company must accept full liability, in writing, for each person whose participation they are seeking to encourage.
2. It shall be a class A felony to deny people, or seek to deny them, access to any GRAS or widely prescribed preventive medicines, including any on the WHO's list of essential medicines... or to interfere with public or private speech rights of those who are seeking information, or seeking to inform other people about their rights, including their rights in relation to any legal healthcare options, including their options in seeking to prevent and minimize the impacts of any disease.
3. Media organizations are not health care providers. It shall be a crime for any media organization or communications or related service providers to render any medical judgment or opinion on the utility of, or the advantages of, one course or regime of treatment over another... but neither may any provider of any such service or facility exercise any editorial control over the content or speech of independent persons, including independent authors and journalists, seeking to provide the public with information about the full range of treatment options that exist. However, any such publication must clearly identify the providers of such information as "unqualified" or as "potentially well informed"... if they have a degree in a related field... or as a "qualified medical expert" ...or a "qualified scientific expert" only if they have specific expertise relevant to the narrowly defined issue... for example, in the case of a specific viral disease, doctors and biomedical workers engaged in drug discovery addressing the known genetics and particular features of a particular virus... might be judged experts... while pharmacists, nurses, and doctors and scientists with specialties outside of viral research might be deemed "potentially well informed".
4. Vaccination status and related preventive and protective health care choices are covered under all applicable State and Federal privacy laws, including HIPPA. No one may request such personal information from or about any individual, without having a legitimate reason, defined as a qualified health care provider engaged in providing requested voluntary health care services to an individual seeking them voluntarily, and without being subject to any coercion or duress.
|
