2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 379.87

+0.4%

Nov 11 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sense who wrote (175909)	8/7/2021 8:44:04 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) of 217706

<<Much in there that's wrong...>> I suspect most of what I said is correct. I agree that the correct masks will reduce exposure in intense concentrations of viruses. That is as much as I would agee to. As an engineer I had to wear masks a lot, and work in clean environments. Class 10 (Less then 10 one micron particles per cubic foot or less) Typically easily achieved using modern hepa filtered air This is what the real science suggests. (1) Viruses travel globally. Take your mask off when you get home... what does that do? (2) If you are exposed to a high concentration of viruses, you will be covered in them. Do you take an "anti virus shower" before you get home and then take off your mask? (3) And this one is more then a "suggests" its in a book written by a real expert... We dont know the propagation system of the influenza (including Corona and derivative) viruses. I have not read this book but Ivor Cummings mentions it. On the epidemiology of influenza \| Virology Journal \| Full Text (biomedcentral.com) (4) <<that magically evaded an N100 mask>> Uh? Come on... No magic about it at all. i.e you would become contaminated if: (i)You took the mask off in a "safe" environment that actually isnt safe. (ii) Live viruses were on your clothes when you took the mask off. (iii) you touched the contaminated outside of an N100 mask. ... the list goes on for some very considerable extent. No rabbit & hat pulling magic needed at all. More like a "oh fk I just probably contaminated myself with the deadly virus."** in almost every situation. It's fairly easy experiment to construct with some kind of marker with some sub micron particles. I bet you the success rate will almost be zero, and only improve very slightly with much practicing, training, and a lot of probable design changes and intermediate steps like "antiviral showers". In an immediate new challenge and outbreak yes mask could be deemed as compulsory, in any kind of long term strategy ... forget it. It's not reasonable or practical. I feel fairly certain on that point. Enough to argue at length about it for sure -g-

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next