| | | I have data.
From a large NO hospital.
About 70% of new cases from the unvaccinated.
The rest, vaccinated.
And the rate of hospitalizations has gone hyperbolic. We are now at risk of coming into the range where health care systems are heading towards disaster. Thanks, in the main, to the unvaccinated.
Thanks, thanks a LOT.
What I don’t know is the brand of vaccines among the 30% unvaccinated.
Let’s assume vaccinations, in general, provide 70% protection against hospitalization.
Are you Ok with that?
Or are you willing to take a chance that [1] you are more likely to get the disease and [2] more likely to get a more serious episode?
I play poker.
I’m all about probabilities and risk assessment.
I did a huge amount of research re: HCQ. In my view, it work both as a prophylactic and as a treatment, provided it is used soon enough. It is a wonderful zinc ionophore. Deadly to the virus. I have not done the same kind of exacting research regarding Invermactin.
What I cannot do is get HCQ Rx’d as a prophylactic. So, I take my zinc, D3, C, etc.
And, given my assessment of risk, I got vaccinated.
It is highly unlikely that I’ll get the virus. If I do, it will be a mild case.
The vaccines, especially the Moderna jab, are highly effective.
Sometimes you must take a reasonable gamble. This is one. I have seen nothing to suggest that I’ll grow two extra thumbs as a result. Or that I’m likely to be another idiot patient at a hospital ICU unnecessarily taking up space.
Show me the data that proves that what I’m doing is unreasonable.
I’ll gladly take a booster, if necessary.
Sometimes the most intelligent people, like you, can be unbelievably stubborn and stupid. Once your mind is made up, you will not change it. Crazy.
You’re no youngster, you are at risk for a serious episode.
Good luck.
And, by the way, your slogan is itself a slogan. |
|
