| 10:43 | | Tragic Consequences of the Vax in Hungary — Part 2 of 3 |
| 10:47 | | You lost your wife. Yes. My ex-wife, because we divorced. But we still got on well, so… |
| 10:54 | | I lost my mother. —You lost your mother. And you lost your grandmother. —That’s right. |
| 10:59 | | What exactly happened? —She was scheduled for vaccination on March 24. |
| 11:05 | | At the vaccination point of Petz Aladár Hospital |
| 11:08 | | in Gyor. The GP sent her there. [The GP] told her that she would get the Sputnik [vaccine]. |
| 11:13 | | And she got an appointment for the afternoon. |
| 11:17 | | I drove her there by car — and I accompanied her to the entrance of the vaccination point. |
| 11:23 | | And I waited there. —What happened at the vaccination point was that… you better say that because… |
| 11:30 | | I warned my mother: “Mom, you filled in this Statement of Consent; |
| 11:36 | | you underlined that you have high blood pressure, |
| 11:42 | | chronically ill… and all that?” She insisted like: |
| 11:46 | | “Yes, yes, of course, Tündi; come in there with me.” |
| 11:50 | | But then it turned out later that she had filled it in |
| 11:54 | | all like “no, nothing” — as if she had been healthy. |
| 11:59 | | The soldiers did not let me in [the hospital], so I couldn’t |
| 12:04 | | go in with her. And when she came out, my first question was |
| 12:08 | | “How are you; don’t you feel bad? Are you okay, was |
| 12:12 | | there no problem after your vaccine was administered? |
| 12:17 | | Please show me your paper!” And then I discovered that she was sent there |
| 12:22 | | by the GP [as if she were] healthy, while [the GP] knew she was chronically ill. |
| 12:27 | | She should not have received Sputnik at all; here is the guideline |
| 12:32 | | by Szlávik that Sputnik must not be given to people over 60. |
| 12:36 | | It must not be given to the chronically ill over 60. |
| 12:40 | | This certificate shows… —That vaccine wasn’t appropriate either. |
| 12:45 | | Just a moment. To be [categorized] chronically ill, |
| 12:49 | | it is enough to tick the high blood pressure. |
| 12:53 | | I filed a request [for the paper] later, and it was proven that [my mother] |
| 12:57 | | had not check-marked [illnesses]. But the GP should not have [done so] anyway. |
| 13:01 | | “RISK GROUP: a healthy person over the age |
| 13:05 | | of 60” — it is put like this about her. |
| 13:09 | | Which was not the case. Although the Sputnik vaccine must not be administered to a |
| 13:14 | | chronically ill patient with a severe haematopoietic disorder. |
| 13:18 | | So it is contraindicated. —That wasn’t OK in the first place. |
| 13:21 | | Based on her previous medical findings, this is a valid [contraindication]; |
| 13:24 | | since the director general of Petz Aladár County Hospital, who is a vascular surgeon — |
| 13:30 | | he had done surgery on her — and he had said she had had mild atherosclerosis; |
| 13:36 | | but that it required treatment because |
| 13:39 | | it could get worse later. And the autopsy |
| 13:43 | | report also writes “general atherosclerosis.” |
| 13:47 | | Which is not such a serious problem, |
| 13:50 | | that could have caused [that injury]. Because the cause of |
| 13:55 | | death is that she had a four-centimeter aortic dissection. |
| 14:00 | | As an underlying disease an ascending |
| 14:04 | | aortic dissection was found to have occurred; |
| 14:08 | | and the cause of death is that the blood |
| 14:13 | | flowed back into the pericardium, so… |
| 14:16 | | And for comorbidity “high blood pressure” was written — |
| 14:21 | | which is [generally] considered a pre-existing disease. |
| 14:25 | | So for the comorbidity, high blood pressure [was written] |
| 14:29 | | and “general atherosclerosis” — which was not that severe. |
| 14:34 | | A doctor whom we knew… So neither the Coronavirus |
| 14:37 | | nor the vaccine was indicated as the cause of death. |
| 14:40 | | No, nothing, nothing [like that], she had no Covid. |
| 14:43 | | So we asked [another] doctor whom we knew, to look at the autopsy report… |
| 14:48 | | Our aunt [unintelligible] so she has a basic medical education. |
| 14:51 | | And she said that when we had the autopsy report in our hands, |
| 14:55 | | we should show it to her right away. |
| 14:58 | | [The aunt] looked at the autopsy report and said it was meaningless; |
| 15:01 | | that is, there was no causal link between the death and… |
| 15:04 | | This should not have occurred… The paramedics said |
| 15:07 | | it was an “unusual death case”, that is [with] the vaccination… |
| 15:10 | | And they notified the GP, too. And [they said] that therefore |
| 15:13 | | a forensic medical expert should do the autopsy on her. |
| 15:16 | | And Dad also said at that point that an official autopsy [was needed]. |
| 15:24 | | Meanwhile, the GP left this |
| 15:27 | | autopsy certificate there that he had filled out. |
| 15:32 | | He first ticked “can be cremated without an autopsy”. But then |
| 15:36 | | he wrote on it, very reluctantly, because we insisted, that |
| 15:40 | | “can be cremated after autopsy”. That is, he ordered a “plain” |
| 15:44 | | autopsy. So there has not been any authority [involvement] here. |
| 15:48 | | The other oddity is that Dr. Dóra Kéfer Kármen was the vaccinating doctor; |
| 15:53 | | and on the 26th Dr. Dóra Kéfer Kármen was also the autopsy pathologist. |
| 15:58 | | She wrote the opinion, too. |
| 16:01 | | Which is completely… the same person, yes. —“Natural death.” |
| 16:06 | | It is clearly [the same name] on the autopsy report. |
| 16:10 | | So actually the same person stated “natural death” who [unintelligible] the vaccine. |
| 16:16 | | Exactly. That’s right. Did the police start investigating after you filed a report? |
| 16:20 | | No, they didn’t; but they arranged for the autopsy to be done |
| 16:23 | | by the hospital. They spoke with the hospital. |
| 16:26 | | The hospital then received the dead body |
| 16:29 | | and the autopsy was performed. Namely, this vaccinator |
| 16:33 | | doctor did the autopsy; the medical report |
| 16:36 | | written by her is also available for reading. |
| 16:40 | | That medical report is also very sloppy. There are statements in it like |
| 16:45 | | “the injury that caused the death was her natural |
| 16:49 | | underlying disease,” and such things. [The other] doctor we know said “oh my God, |
| 16:56 | | this can’t be.” She said such aortic ruptures |
| 17:00 | | occur in people who carry heavy |
| 17:04 | | loads, or take drugs like heroin or cocaine; |
| 17:08 | | and a sudden jump of high blood pressure causes such [aortic] rupture. |
| 17:14 | | And she admitted she never heard of such a huge rupture before. |
| 17:19 | | We looked it up, and the Sputnik [vaccine] causes an increase in blood pressure. |
| 17:23 | | And about the four-centimeter rupture she said |
| 17:26 | | she never heard of such a case before in medical circles. |
| 17:30 | | “That anyone would have had a one centimeter-thick aortic rupture like that”. |
| 17:35 | | As a result, her blood pressure rose at around |
| 17:38 | | dawn, and that’s when this rupture occurred. |
| 17:41 | | To sum it up in one sentence: she was vaccinated in the afternoon and then she was dead |
| 17:46 | | by the next morning — and they concluded that it had nothing to do with the vaccination. |
| 17:51 | | And actually, before… I will show you a photo about what she used to look like. |
| 17:57 | | She was healthy, she always came here to help to do the washing and the hoeing. |
| 18:03 | | She hasn’t taken anything for high blood pressure for years. |
| 18:07 | | She was here every day, helping in the business. |
| 18:10 | | She had had no health problems whatsoever. |
| 18:14 | | Here at home we always checked her oxygen level with the oximeter. Everything was fine. |
