Re <<We know it's bat and pangolin wet market soup wot dunnit.
Ignore the man in front of the curtain [Fauci].>>
You might be very wrong about bat and pangolin, but still be correct about Fauci.
I remain agnostic, but following on to ample doubts given too much smoke per Message 33430919 <<Tuskegee … Crack … Plutonium Files … Operation Sea Spray … Agent Orange … Fauci / Covid-19 Dossier … David Martin patent highlights … Fort Detrick shutdown … NIH Study re Early Infections USA … Vaping Mystery … The Great Germ Warfare Cover-up>> now something else has come to light …
… admittedly investigations went wide afield, but upon chancing on something inconvenient, akin to smoking gun, that does not fit the GOP / DNC narrative, just claim ‘false positive’.
Wondering if the new-found facts merit a mention in the undoubtedly conclusive Team Biden’s report. Tough call. Wondering if there are deers in Maryland, say particularly around Fort Detrick, and wondering if the deers carry CCP membership card.
As narratives go, just one more out of many, warranting investigation as any, am guessing.
Test the blood supply inventory everywhere ought to be more conclusive. Certainly doable.
scmp.com
Coronavirus: US scientists suggest another animal link in tests on deer samples
- The discovery could ‘provide baseline information for surveyed populations prior to pathogen emergence’, say scientists
- The USDA says the results, which were tested in two different labs using different methods, ‘likely a false positive’
A blood sample collected from American white-tailed deer in 2019 turned out to be positive in antibody tests for Covid-19 infection, according to a new study conducted by US government scientists.
The researchers discovered three more positive samples dated in January 2020, when the virus was newly identified in China.
These samples were collected “very early in the pandemic” from wild deer populations in different parts of the US, said quantitative biologist Susan Shriner with the National Wildlife Research Centre in a paper posted on the preprint server bioRxiv.org on July 29.
…
Shriner and her colleagues sent their samples to another government laboratory that ran tests with a different method. The results were consistent.
In a statement posted on its website, the USDA said the sample in 2019 was “likely a false positive”. However, Shriner’s paper made no such a statement. She did not respond to a request from the South China Morning Post for comment.
…
The study was based on more than 600 samples, with most collected this year. Although the US team did not discuss the origin of the virus, the paper has caught attention in China.
“This is a critical breakthrough in tracing the origin of the novel coronavirus,” Beijing-based newspaper Science and Technology Daily reported on Tuesday, quoting an expert involved in China’s origin investigation programme .
…
“Testing deer is not enough. It is also necessary to test the archived blood samples of residents living nearby to help answer some important questions, such as whether there were some early transmissions between wild animals and residents that made the virus more adaptive to humans,” the virologist said.
|
