Science says vax works...
No, it doesn't. Science is very clear that THIS vax... is not a vax... and DOES NOT WORK... and in fact, says the opposite... that not only does the vax NOT work... its claimed benefits are proving illusory, while its harms are very real...
Science says the opposite... it is only "agencies" with agendas and not "science" claiming this vax "works"...
That's true... particularly true... even if the focus you adopt is to consider the "existing" vax ONLY in relation to the other... far more likely to be successful... potentials that have not been granted any extra-ordinary exemptions from standards of medical practice. Those others have been suppressed and delayed... in spite of them being known as posing no obvious risks at all.
What the vax does "work" to do... is two things: it works to convert the compliant population into unwitting test subjects in an experiment that is known to have significant risks... while being unlikely to succeed in its stated end goals... and it works to prosecute some unacknowledged agenda at the subjects expense...
Of course, it is not hyperbole to note the above constitute crimes against humanity... that being reinforced all the more as efforts increasingly ramp up to try to bribe, threaten, and coerce people into submitting to being made a part of the medical experiment... without informed consent...
The only way you can get to "Science says vax works" is by lying about words... what "science" is, what the word "vaccine" means, what "works" means... or in fostering the logical errors inherent in wrongly transferring the general to the specific... [vaccines work, therefore this "vaccine" works... masks work, therefore this bit of paper we've required be stuck to your face must work]... And the only way you get there, to justify the campaign based on lies... is by putting some other agenda ahead of "science"... and ahead of humanity in its concern for people... ahead of oaths to "first, do no harm"... and ahead of prohibitions on committing crimes against humanity by conducting medical experiments on people.
And, as agenda dominate the science... whose agenda is it ? With what purpose ? As that purpose is not in alignment with concern for public health... or compliance with basic standards essential to sustaining it... demanding what response ?
The vax does not come close meet existing standards for basic use approval... only for a start...
If it is every approved for use... that in itself will be, against the science, a purely political act... performed in opposition to evidence and science... but also, in opposition to morality and the requirements of basic law...
That political act... advancing man's inhumanity... one to watch carefully ?
The standards being violated are not science, but the standards are an agenda that is both "morality based" and "science based"... enabled in the interest of public health... fully purposed to prevent "the enthusiastic" from repeating egregious errors that have been made in the past far too often... and no LESS often after Nuremberg...
"First, do no harm"... is an essential component... which is not science... but is an agenda... that those lying about the science are intent on violating...
The vax doesn't even comply with basic pre-existing requirements to justify there even being a vax...
It is a "solution in search of a problem" from that perspective... that is only enabled by obstructing other known to be functional approaches that SHOULD obviate all Covid vax research on humans being allowed... again showing it is agenda driven... and NOT based in science working within the moral limits that defines science that we accept...
Science does not prove the experiments being done are crimes against humanity... it is the agenda of humanity and the standards it requires, and imposes in law, that provide the test of science in its acts.
Science, in this instance, has failed humanity... but it is not the "idea" of science that has failed... rather than the people who have abused science, and humanity, as they violated the rules for how science is to be conducted...
Experiments conducted on unwilling, uninformed, duped, or coerced test subjects may be "science" in that sense... if you accept that violence against others is a fully legitimate tool in recruitment of participants in forced experiments... without that requiring, as you seem to accept must be true [only because you have an excess in faith that no one you trust or agree with would violate you in that way ?] that the outcome of the experiment thus conducted is known before conducting it...
You trust that others would not violate your trust... and knowingly hurt you.
I know better. History provides ample proofs... and ample reason to not remain blind to the same now.
There's nothing wrong with the standards, either... nor is there anything currently in play as a risk to humanity that's greater than the one they pose... that justifies them in circumventing the standards... Their lack of compliance with the basic requirements is just "a fail"... making it not at all surprising that the none of the metrics in the evidence proffered as validation for the effort... work to validate the effort.
That includes the only possible advantage being claimed in... mortality reduction... as, vaxxed or not, mortality reduction is already easily accomplished by other means... including that reductions claimed to be vax derived now appear to have not been... while the "success" of vax in mortality reduction is inferior in its accounting, even by the standards of those offering "the proof" ?
Delta is not particularly deadly... That the vax both fosters it and provides zero protection against it... makes the vax far more of a problem than a solution...
Small molecule drugs and biologics offer superior protection... developed at vastly lower cost and in fractions of the time required to design, build and test... any new vaccine.
And, it is that "fail" noted above... and not the virus itself... that is the source of the problems the virus still imposes now, as the delta variant... or in other extant variants.
There will be other variants that emerge... some may prove more deadly than delta, even more deadly than the alpha...
What science shows... is that the corporate interest in creating and selling vaccines as solutions... when there are less risky and more vastly effective and efficient alternatives and alternative approaches available... that do not result in conditioning people to expose themselves to abuse through medical manipulation... is harming humanity.
Science helps in providing alternatives... but it cannot provide alternative decisions...
Decisions require choices being made... and science doesn't do that...
Choices are driven by agendas...
Better choices result when the agencies are open, honest, and truthful, when the agendas are known... and the process of decision making is rational and democratic, rather than self-interested and conducted in secret...
Bad choices, or worse... result when agencies exclude truth, lie, and ensure agenda are hidden...
If the agenda is driven by humanity... and lives by "first, do no harm"... ?
The resources should be removed from the vaccination effort. All sources of obstructions to known functional alternatives should be removed. No vaccine should be approved for use without full and adequate risk analysis, and testing and monitoring that complies fully with all ethical guidelines, including informed consent... and properly pre-defined properly risked suspension criteria.
Resources should be transferred to accelerate the development of a basic library of small molecules... to defining and addressing the full range of known vectors of viral attack... and in parallel, addressing not only "silver bullets" but integrated solutions in systemic resistance and response... as well as human systems level improvements in preventive medicine... that are more rapidly develop-able into barriers to and counters against the NEXT challenge that WILL BE mounted, by nature or otherwise, as an attack on human immune systems, or on the human genome... or targeting some change imposing degraded performance versus optimal.
As important... addressing the origins of viri and viral vectors... and their introduction to the population by humans and human systems... basic level prevention... requires change, including in strengthening systemic capacity to resist violations of ethics... and enforce prohibitions against such violations. |
