2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 378.35

+2.7%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

ggersh

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (176891)	8/21/2021 8:29:22 PM
From: marcher	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 217651

--if your freedom fcucks me up.. fcuk u :) ... ... maybe go live in the wilderness if it's no good for you ...-- you replied to my question about science/truth with these comments. are you referring to me? how do your comments relate to what i've posted? my question's intent was to delve into your relativistic truth position in relation to your support for 'science'. i was wondering if you were being consistent. it's still not clear to me. when someone has a belief in relativistic ethics, it seems like that person would be less likely to say another person is 'wrong'... since claiming someone is "wrong" would violate notions of relativism. seems confusing. really don't get the 'freedom fcuk' response.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next