SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 385.99+1.6%Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
maceng2
To: SirWalterRalegh who wrote (177098)8/24/2021 8:01:47 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation   of 217739
 
I am waiting for Team <<Biden>>’s mouthpiece Kamala who is now braving Havana Syndrome to tour Hanoi, to champion the purchase of green-enabling batteries from like-minded S Korea instead of CCP China China China, for it would be in character with the bipartisan meme on everything except CoVid protocol

Re CoVid, and anti-CoVid, am agnostic to the extent I wish to stay away from both :0)

Re batteries, same agnosticism applies.

I am biased towards healthy and traditional.

bloomberg.com

Who's Making Those EV Batteries That Are Catching on Fire?

Investors and analysts are so focused on the steep cost of recalls for carmakers that they haven’t considered the role of one company at the center of it all.

Anjani Trivedi25 August 2021, 06:30 GMT+8
Over the past six months, a handful of the world’s largest electric-vehicle makers have announced some of the most expensive recalls in the history of the auto industry. Investors are focused on the billions of dollars this will cost and who will foot the bill. Instead, they should be asking about the battery manufacturer at the center of it all, LG Energy Solutions, and the promise it’s selling to shareholders and car companies.

General Motors Co. this month recalled its Bolt EVs for the third time in nine months, adding 73,000 newervehicles. The latest measure — which will cost around $1 billion, for a total of $1.8 billion — includes every Bolt electric car. That follows a Hyundai Motor Co. recall of 82,000 EVs earlier this year, at a cost of around $900 million. In both cases, faulty batteries made by LG Energy Solutions, a unit of South Korean industrial heavyweight LG Chem Ltd., have led to vehicle fires. LG said the cost of the Bolt recall would be split depending on the outcome of a joint investigation.

While it’s understandable that carmakers and their investors are focused on the costs — Hyundai did have to pick up part of the tab, and ended up taking a hit of 387 billion Korean won ($332 million) — the bigger issue is that poorly made batteries are putting people’s lives at risk. This is a result of carmakers’ impatience and seeming inability to properly assess the risks of doing business in emerging technologies — and, potentially, conducting poor due diligence on their partners.

A closer and harder look at the LG unit is warranted. It is slated to go public later this year in what could be South Korea’s biggest ever public listing, at $10 billion to $12 billion. The company is one of the largest battery suppliers for major electric vehicle models, and has rushed to expand across the world. This rapid pace of investment, possibly boosted by its parent’s complementary electronics and chemicals businesses, has allowed it to accelerate production, making LG Energy Solutions a ready and appealing partner. The company has inked deals with several automakers, including Tesla Inc., and is in a joint venture with GM to develop a proprietary battery technology central to the U.S. carmaker’s $27 billion green strategy. That means amid the scramble (and pressure) to meet regulatory standards and company targets for sales and emissions, even more LG-made batteries will be housed in cars across the world.

In the latest recalls, key components within the battery were damaged. In “rare circumstances,” the anode tab was torn and the separator was folded, GM said. Unusual as they may be, these defects increase the risk of fires. GM said it will replace the modules “out of an abundance of caution.” It’s worth noting these are the most basic of battery parts — not particularly complex, but essential. In Hyundai’s case, a government investigation found the batteries could short-circuit. Separately, another type of battery – a residential energy-storage system installed in homes and made by an LG unit in Michigan — was recalled for the second time earlier this month because it was determined to be a fire hazard.

Opinion. Data. More Data.Get the most important Bloomberg Opinion pieces in one email.

Sign up to this newsletter

Too few analysts and investors are asking basic questions about battery technology, manufacturing quality, or the rationale behind the choice of partners. Even after its expensive recall, Hyundai announced in July it again was partnering with LG Energy Solutions to build a $1.1 billion plant in Indonesia — one of the largest producers of nickel, a raw material — to “secure a stable supply of battery cells.” These are important signals to assess battery capacity as EV demand continues to grow. In reality, though, it’s worth wondering how “secure” these products really are.

As billions of dollars are poured into companies’ green ambitions, one-time recall costs may be seem urgent now but are easy to forget. The same can’t be said for the lives that are potentially at risk.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Anjani Trivedi at atrivedi39@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Rachel Rosenthal at rrosenthal21@bloomberg.net

Sent from my iPhone
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext