Topcat, you conveniently mis-answered/didn't answer. And by so doing, you conveniently don't address much of what has happened in the "saga" of this stock.
The gist of your response...
>>Why? for the jollies?<<
Al, you (and others) may not like this, but.....why not? The only reason to post on a public thread from a yea point of view is to generate positive pressure on a stock. The balance to this is the participation on the nay side.
does not address/answer what Allen pointed out:
Why would an uninterested party call the sec, or
wherever that is, that is supposed to be let alone
to do their job.
Just to cause trouble?
If s martin has financial gain or loss, let HIM do
it.
Mischief at some point DOES become malicious.
Putting up a site, and accusing Riley of altering a
financial document?
Why? for the jollies?
Your response, that posting on a public thread by positive and negative sides, to achieve "balance", completely ignores the points made and the activities witnessed. Mork's lawsuits, kugler's complaints to the SEC, the web sites put up to discredit the company, Mork's press releases, the (probably likely) calls to Sharpe, the insults, the attempt to steal Olympus' name, etc. etc.
"Mischief at some point DOES become malicious." Well said. And so apparently true here.
I believe you posted earlier that you are away from home during the week. So your presence here is for what - to pass the time? To add "balance" to the thread? You may be right in saying that posting from both nays and yeas yields a balance. Hopefully, that would be a balance of thought or facts. That hasn't been the case here though. This company and this stock has been mercilessly attacked. Both here on the thread and in the public venue.
Please don't say you ignore or can't see that and that the actions of some of the nays were only for "balance". |
