SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (480455)10/1/2021 3:48:39 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) of 541791
 
Which Was Bigger: The 2009 Recovery Act or FDR's New Deal?

May 30, 2017

Total Cost

Assistant Vice President and Economist William Dupor noted that ARRA’s total cost was $840 billion. The New Deal, on the other hand, cost $41.7 billion at the time, according to a 2015 study by economists Price Fishback and Valentina Kachanovskaya.1 That figure translates to $653 billion in 2009 dollars (the year ARRA was passed).

“Without any other adjustment, one would conclude that the Recovery Act was the more expensive of the two stimulus programs, which also would make it the most expensive in U.S. history,” Dupor wrote.

more
stlouisfed.org

The 2 covid bills, the infrastructure bill, and the reconciliation bill will all cost at least twice what the inflation-adjusted New Deal did. In addition, there was another covid bill in Dec, 2020, which was over $900B. Those are our 5 biggest spending bills ever, in a span of 18 months, or whenever reconciliation passes.

That's a fuckload of money.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext