SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ditchdigger who wrote (68977)11/3/2021 2:38:05 PM
From: petal  Read Replies (1) of 78815
 
MAC, BGS, DISCK.

MAC: Indeed, peeled of my position somewhat. Still like it for the very long term.

Another one with agreeable movement recently: B&G Foods (BGS). Stock has a pretty big day, though I can't see any company specific news, except that it supposedly crossed the "200MA" line. Stock hadn't done me much good before that though. Still holding, possibly peeling some off there too. (I just can't stand outstanding paper profits...)

DISCK: Bough more yesterday, today up 5 %. When these things happen, am I wrong to think of it in annualised return? I don't think so. Same when a stock is up 20-30 % in ~ 2 months. CAGR is just too good (way above 100%) to be true (i.e. sustainable).

I've started thinking about all paper gains in CAGR, doing a rough calculation in my head.
E.g., one day return of 5 % is about 5 421 184 057.79 % annualised...

Seems to me that a rule of thumb for annualising <1 year returns is that 5 % return/month (after taxes, commissions etc.) is "too good not to sell". (I.e. 5 % in one month, 10 % in two months, 20 % in four months, etc.) That is 50-60 % compounded annually, i.e. very very good returns (for a fund manager, anyway.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext