SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tickertype who wrote (2037)2/6/1998 12:05:00 AM
From: Paul Dubsky  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
The question that comes to my mind is what does "good production" mean? Some companies do OEM contracts but can only deliver on a small fraction of their commitment, but they get OEM $$ in their pockets.

IMO, if VLNC can spit out some good batteries at even 1/2 the capacity, they should do a deal to get credibility to support the stock, at which time they could do another offering against a stock price that is at least $10 vs one that's $4.50.

Tenuous or not, if it's money that needs to be placed on this company,, I wouldn't suspect that VLNC would have trouble raising it given the potential of the product.

At the very least, VLNC could agree to a major JV or $$ injection by the likes of a SONY or MOT or Everready to keep them afloat. The investing company would get a leg up on the competition and VLNC would keep chugging. (I've seen much worse companies with worse prospects get financing.)

The "at least another year" time-table would really stink, though, short term. In the big picture of things, if I have to wait another year to get $50/share on my $7/share purchase, I'll wait. I'm not going anywhere now anyhow! I'm sticking with this big ol boat even if it goes down. Pretty stubborn, but I can't get over the potential of VLNC long term.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext