SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DMaA who wrote (753352)11/29/2021 10:10:31 AM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
isopatch
John Hayman
steve harris

  Read Replies (1) of 793917
 
It is a little anti-intuitive that engineering a collapse will help them in the election.

I agree. A collapse will benefit the opposing party, but a total meltdown is what the article is assuming, IMO.

“Get us to a place where we have just staggering financial problems, and so more control by the federal government must be put into place.”

“More controls by the Federal Reserve, more control by the federal government, meaning that we’re going to see more emergency orders from the White House to do certain things.”

There would also be widespread unrest, looting, riots and then martial law. I can't see holding elections under martial law but of course universal mail-in voting might be allowed. We know how that works now.

It's definitely an insane idea to pursue, but we are talking about liberals that will do anything to keep from losing power.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News