SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Hard Look At Donald Trump

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Glenn Petersen
kidl
Ms. Baby Boomer
scion
From: Brumar8912/16/2021 8:10:25 AM
4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 46420
 
Jim Jordan’s Office Confirms He Sent Texts to Mark Meadows on Jan 6th

DECEMBER 15, 2021

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) spent seven minutes on the House floor Tuesday disputing the contempt charges against Mark Meadows, whom he described as “a good man, and he is my friend.” Jordan was responding to the House Select Committee’s release of texts sent to Meadows on January 6th from Fox News anchors and others close to Trump as the riot raged throughout the Capitol.

But in his attempt to distract from the reason the body was assembled to vote, Jordan not only didn’t help his friend, but he also ended up incriminating himself.

Jordan’s office was forced to confirm on Wednesday that he is the sender of at least one text message to Trump’s former White House Chief of Staff that was partially revealed this week by the Select Committee and attributed only to “a lawmaker.”

Here’s the full text: “On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence. ‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’ The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).”

..................

hillreporter.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext