| | | Uh, oh.
Igor Danchenko, indicted along with Sussman in Durham’s probe, represented by the same lawyers who represent the Clinton Campaign…..in the same probe. Durham raises ethical issues with the representation.
Why?
If Clinton Campaign is a target, a conflict of interest. And Durham reveals that Danchenko’s new lawyers (he fired his original ones) represent employees of the Clinton campaign “in matters before the Special Counsel.”
Uh, oh.
Jake Sullivan has to be concerned. Ditto Blumenthal.
I’d sure like to know who these Clinton Campaign employees Durham mentions might be and why, if they’re innocent, they need attorneys. And more important, why they represent both Danchenko and the employees. Danchenko is not a Clinton employee, so his interests aren’t aligned with them. But they can surely report to Hillary what Danchenko is doing. In other words, is Danchenko angling for a plea by ratting out the Clinton Campaign?
It’s a pretty sleazy move, but what do you expect from anything the Clinton’s touch?
Durham best hurry, the clock on the statute of limitations is ticking away.
technofog.substack.com
Wouldn’t it be nice if Bill gets seriously embroiled in the Epstein case via Ghislaine Maxwell while Hillary gets indicted for Russia Hoax? |
|
