SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (221695)1/4/2022 12:14:22 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 361827
 
>> So they don't have anything because they didn't have have anything. I believe that's called a tautology.

I don't think it is quite a tautology, but more importantly, it is a product of Occam's Razor. The most likely explanation is the Democrats have nothing because there is nothing to have. There is no crime of inaction of a president to a riot based on the television reports he was seeing. That simply does not exist. Hence, there is no reason for this fake committee to exist, other than as a political tool. That Trump's likely primary opponent is on the committee is pretty ridiculous if you think a little.

Consider that not one member of that committee showed up on the first day with a clear head: There was never any intent to do anything but get Trump. That's why we have Cheney instead of someone who took his seat with an open mind. Not one did. Every person on that committee was appointed because they had it out for Trump.

This statement alone disqualifies all output, not most but ALL output of the committee from consideration.

So, you tell me. What righteous output from this committee can occur other than the development of a bragging right or false accusation? What is the range of possibilities?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext