SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (221976)1/6/2022 2:56:44 PM
From: Lane32 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
combjelly

  Read Replies (1) of 354171
 
Look at the bottom of the page for this chart and the matching state-by-state listing below it that breaks down signature match hits for the last three elections. This is the correct data, and doesn't use any weasel words as Reuters so called "fact check" did.

Well, no, it isn't. It may be correct but it doesn't speak to signature matches, which was the topic on the table and the category for which you claimed your numbers.

Edit: May I point out that where we started this was your assertion of

GA where there is no ID, no signature match, nothing.


Yet here we are talking about the figures for signature match rejections. Interesting that we could do that when GA allegedly has no signature match.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News