SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (222056)1/7/2022 11:37:00 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 353964
 
>> That is, indeed, a large change. They purposely changed their procedures so a large change is to be expected. As you explained.

Yes, a huge change. Yes, they changed their procedures to be less effective so of course the number of rejections was radically reduced.

The objective is not to get smaller numbers. The objective is to get precisely the correct numbers. They did not move toward that objective a single inch.

>> Despite your insistence earlier that you had numbers for Georgia's signature mismatches, you didn't. You had only total rejections. But we can make some guesses from the national breakdown of ballot rejections, which I found at your source. Over three elections nationwide, a quarter of the rejections were from signature mismatches. If we were to apply that percentage to your favorite number set, we would get a change in Georgia of not 6.4% to 0.4% but 1.6% to 0.1 for signature mismatches. That just doesn't look like such a big number or a glaring difference, not big enough do justify the outrage you're showing. Just saying...

Please indicate which states you're referring to for a little more clarity?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext