>> Which I watched. It was funny. It's old. I had seen it before. Didn't hear "democratic norms." Didn't hear anything that had anything to do with signatures or computers. Didn't hear anything that had anything to do with voting at all.
What you witnessed was me throwing up my hands and saying, "You cannot just ignore half the voters in the country, who believe with good cause that the election was stolen." And yesterday's ridiculous display was one more example of it. It was absurd.
What I witnessed on the video was a rant on political correctness. What I witnessed in your text was cognitive spaghetti.
>> The only question I heard was "what, are we going to not think?"
If you didn't take away an understanding of his message, I recogonize my limitations and I know I can't help.
Jordan Peterson, no fan of Trump -- but the brightest mind in the room 100% of the time, commented on this basic problem some time ago. It is brief but highly important and relevant. You should think about how you would answer Peterson's questions You asked me to consider his questions. The only question I found, his opening question, I answered. Perhaps by your limitations you mean your inability to recognize a question in a video. Or the inability to frame a question of your own you'd like me to answer. I did what you asked. I considered his question. I even threw in an answer, gratis. If you want something different, make a different request. If you want to change the subject to political correctness, for example, don't hide the change of direction in the middle of a long rant on voting. |
