SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (222064)1/7/2022 12:42:50 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 353952
 
Yes, they changed their procedures to be less effective so of course the number of rejections was radically reduced.

That it's "less effective" is your spin on it. The only way that works logically is if your objective is to reduce the number of votes. Which, of course, is your stated objective. If you're an election professional in Republican Georgia, not so much.

The objective is not to get smaller numbers. The objective is to get precisely the correct numbers. They did not move toward that objective a single inch.

You don't know that.

Please indicate which states you're referring to for a little more clarity?

Like I said,"national breakdown of ballot rejections, which I found at your source." National, as in gross national numbers, as in all the states, not broken down by state. National.

15% were missing signatures altogether, by comparison. 21% were rejected because they arrived late. In context, unmatched signatures are not the be all and end all of ballot rejections. Not even close.

I said I wasn't going to do any more work... :/
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News