2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 445.60

-10.1%

Jan 30 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: gg cox who wrote (182849)	1/18/2022 4:42:27 PM
From: alanrs	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 219949

The track record for them is exceptional I'm too lazy to find the source but I've read that this isn't actually true. It does depend on ones definition of success of course, the majority have done much good. I'm vaccinated for everything under the sun including shingles and pneumonia (for instance). However, if memory serves, roughly 30% of all approved vaccines are subsequently removed as unsafe, and this after passing the normal decade long extended trials. There's probably some name for this phenomenon, where failures are quickly and quietly withdrawn leaving the successes to be more widely perceived. All that has little bearing on the current situation since the experimental fluid is not a vaccine if the same definition is used as was used in the above referenced previous vaccines. I don't see how any inference can be drawn from that history. Not to mention that the current jab has done far more damage (according to VARS) than has ever before been tolerated. New critter. Not even apples and oranges, apples and nobody quite knows what.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next