SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (755816)1/24/2022 5:11:15 PM
From: skinowski4 Recommendations

Recommended By
D. Long
lightshipsailor
Maple MAGA
Maurice Winn

  Read Replies (1) of 793843
 
A large NATO army in Ukraine might be considered a threat. The much more likely low level deployment like in the one in the Baltics (whether in the Baltics or in Ukraine) not so much.
The Baltics are already NATO members. Even a limited deployment of NATO forces in Ukraine would be like being a little bit pregnant. A done deal. The reason Russia is going through this entire drama of force buildup and ultimatums is that such an outcome to them would be unacceptable.

It should be unacceptable to us as well. Rendering them indefensible by conventional means makes them dangerous.

(Edit - Brzezinski was a smart guy, but he let his tribal hatreds get the better of him. And we are letting him get the better of us)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News