SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 379.87+0.4%Nov 11 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
marcher
To: maceng2 who wrote (183283)1/29/2022 7:17:38 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 217699
 
:0) Re <<The Chinese authorities have changed the ending of the Hollywood "Fightclub" movie. Not a movie I have watched, but of course suitably shocked and horrified>>

A BEAUTIFUL EXAMPLE OF WHAT WAS, IS, AND MIGHT BE, AND THEN TOLD, ... DEPENDING ON THE READS ...

But, scroll and read down below the article, and you tell me if 'something wrong' :0)))))

According to Palahniuk, the ending of his 1996 novel has been changed many times before, and the original version is still banned in some parts of the U.S.

Here be one set of reads by easy search china changed fight club to original ending


Here be another read, according to the author ... you know, in the case of mRNA, according to one of its enablers, Doc Malone

ala yellow cake, something about 911 and Afghanistan, and Iraq, and presumably Iran, and who can know, maybe the Israelis or the Russians, and hack, these days, China China China

But in the case of the movie, what are we to believe?

thehill.com

'Fight Club' author praises China's censored ending

“The irony is that … they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book,” said Chuck Palahniuk, the author of the novel on which David Fincher’s 1999 film “Fight Club” was based.

Chuck Palahniuk, the author of the novel on which David Fincher’s 1999 film “Fight Club” was based, has responded to China’s censored cut of the movie, calling the edit “SUPER wonderful” and more in line with his original ending.



Getty

“Everyone gets a happy ending in China!,” Palahniuk wrote in a tweet this week following news of the censored ending.

“Tyler and the gang were all arrested. He was tried and sentenced to a mental asylum. How amazing. I’d no idea! Justice always wins. Nothing ever exploded. Fini,” he wrote in his substack newsletter “Plot Spoiler.”

At the end of Fincher’s “Fight Club,” Brad Pitt’s character Tyler Durden is killed by Edward Norton’s character the Narrator, who then watches the buildings around him crumble to the ground at the hands of several explosions.

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

In a newly released cut of the film available on the Chinese video streaming service Tencent Video, the Narrator is killed and the explosions are replaced with a black screen and text reading: “Through the clue provided by Durden, the police rapidly figured out the whole plan and arrested all criminals, successfully preventing the bomb from exploding.”

It adds that Durden — a figment of the Narrator’s imagination — was sent to a “lunatic asylum” following a trial, where he received psychological treatment before being discharged in 2012.

The change was almost immediately noticed after “Fight Club” was made available on Tencent over the weekend, confusing those who had seen Fincher’s original version.

“I’d rather see Tencent pull this film … what are you trying to achieve by changing the ending?” one viewer wrote on the Chinese media review forum Douban.

“The irony is that … they’ve aligned the ending almost exactly with the ending of the book, as opposed to Fincher’s ending, which was the more spectacular visual ending. So in a way, the Chinese brought the movie back to the book a little bit,” Palahniuk told TMZ on Wednesday.

According to Palahniuk, the ending of his 1996 novel has been changed many times before, and the original version is still banned in some parts of the U.S.

“The strange flip side is that in many foreign markets the publisher rewrote the novel so it would end like the film,” he wrote this week in his newsletter. “Without permission, I might add.”

“What I find really interesting is that my books are heavily banned throughout the U.S. The Texas prison system refuses to carry my books in their libraries,” Palahniuk told TMZ.

“A lot of public schools and most private schools refuse to carry my books. But it’s only an issue once China changes the end of a movie? I’ve been putting up with book-banning for a long time.”

READ MORE STORIES FROM CHANGING AMERICA

TEXAS GOV. ABBOTT INTRODUCES NEW ‘PARENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS’

SCIENTISTS ARE MONITORING A NEW OMICRON SUBVARIANT CALLED BA.2

HOUSE COMMITTEE IN FLORIDA PASSES ‘DON’T SAY GAY’ BILL

MAN REPORTEDLY DENIED HEART TRANSPLANT BECAUSE HE’S NOT VACCINATED AGAINST COVID-19

RESEARCHERS FIND GENETIC LINK TO COVID-19-INDUCED LOSS OF SMELL AND TASTE
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext