SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Systemsoft Inc. (SYSF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: peter grossman who wrote (3014)2/7/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Mark Brophy  Read Replies (2) of 3529
 
I apologize for my excessive optimism.

Clearly, I was hopelessly overoptimistic on August 24, 1997, when I wrote:

I expect the SystemSoft stock price to drift down to 4 or 5 in the next 6-12 months. It might even get there sooner during the usual tech stock crash that occurs annually in Sept.-Oct.

Like most investors on SI, I don the rose-colored glasses and see only what I want to see. In my defense, I'd like to point out that nobody accused me of hyping the stock and I was closest to the truth. In fact, you wrote that same day at siliconinvestor.com

If anyone has some solid evidence that SystemWizard works on a cost benefit basis to its customers, I'd be very interested, because I think the underlying company without the uncertainty and credibility problems is undervalued at these levels, fairly valued with them.

Now that the SystemWizard expectations have been dramatically reset, I doubt a real surge in the stock can take place until (read "if") rosy SystemWizard projections are truly earned (3 to 6 months). On the other hand, in the 8 to 10 level, I doubt there's much downside for the same period.

For that reason, and because of high premiums due to the report, I think this is a great candidate for covered calls, the position I started on Friday and intend to press.


Even your covered calls weren't enough to hedge this sick company.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext