SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KiddStock who wrote (47139)2/7/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom  Read Replies (2) of 58324
 
Richard, here's my rebuttal to the "local businessman"

He's an idiot.

Ok, so you wanted a little more than that. Ok. Here:

1. Syquest products might enjoy a better price to performance ratio to Iomega products. I have no argument with that.

2. However, Syquest does not enjoy either the brand equity Iomega has. In fact, for Syquest to succeed, they are going to have to replace at least 6MM of those Iomega drives in professional or corporate offices very quickly. And, that ain't going to happen. Remember, Iomega has 12 MM Zips out there (and counting), but has over 15MM personal storage solutions out there. A huge obstacle to Syquest.

3. Most importantly, he is an idiot for investing heavily in Syquest. There are thousands of examples of companies with good products that are lousy investments. Syquest is one of them. Depending on the price he paid for his stock, he will lose his shirt on this one. If Syquest ever turns a profit, he'll have to share that with 150MM other shareholders and bondholders. Of course, Iomega is not much better right now. However, it is a $2B company that has one thing that Syquest will never have: a very definite chance of a takeover if the stock price lags.

Is that a good enough rebuttal for ya?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext