SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (225206)2/7/2022 10:59:00 AM
From: Cautious_Optimist  Read Replies (2) of 362188
 
That 2020 Saudi "study" published in January 2021 is not scientifically valid.

But you start with a conclusion rather than a question, and then seek the(unreliable) evidence which of course is backassward. Forming a conclusion before finding "proof."

Please show me a study that shows a population "protected" by Ivermectin shows any significantly lower levels of death or long Covid etc. than unvaccinated controls, or not publicly masked controls. Which of course would have ethical issues because the unvaccinated and unmasked will die a much higher rate than the vaccinated cohorts.

In health science, as with other "cures" we need more than small invitro studies to be convinced it is helpful and not harmful to humans as with fake Covid cure hydroxychloroquine for example.

Both Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine do have valid uses, so do antibiotics and vitamins; but not vs. Covid19.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News