SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Terry Maloney who wrote (22530)2/7/2022 11:03:53 AM
From: Graystone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
onepath

  Read Replies (2) of 36965
 
Lockdowns
or
Quarantine

You cannot do much for someone who shoots 72 on a par 3, this isn't that difficult.
And the data and the science is widely available to anyone who is actually interested.
Nothing could be clearer to anyone interested in data than this ridiculous study by "economists".
Three American economists have published their study showing that lockdowns don't work.
That is right three "economists" have published a study about "medical" practices.
Apparently they overlooked New Zealand's data entirely, no surprise there.
A Wired article puts the cost of a human life around 10 million dollars using Pinto style math.
Canada has lost around 35,000 people, the cost is about $350,000,000,000 billion dollars.

New Zealand has been more aggressive than China in lockdowns and quarantines.
New Zealand has lost a total of 53 people, that is right, 53, since the start of the pandemic
The estimated cost to New Zealand using Wired figures is around $530,000,000 million dollars.
The economists may have discounted the cost of lives because they were not American Christians.
The dollar values are pretty impressive, even for us non-economists.
The Lancet data is clear, three doses work for omicron.
All this "science" is indisputable, unless you have called a mullligan on being sane.
So lockdowns do work, if you are factually inclined as I know you are, but for "72 on a par3", nope.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext