>> My observation skills tell me that the committee composition, its existence, even, was in large part a function of Republican refusal to participate in an earnest non-partisan inquiry. Some "amiss" was interjected there.
That's a cop-out, any way you look at it.
You always want, on any committee I know of, more views, disparate in nature, not fewer. If the objective were to find the truth.
So, you'd rather have a couple of extreme trump-haters than to have serious questioning by people who are particularly excellent at asking hard questions? Is that how you'd run a serious inquiry? How is that a pursuit of truth? It isn't. It is a quest for unanimity where the majority outcome is predetermined. So, you're talking about unanimity in Trump Hate. Which is consistent with Pelosi's actions for four straight years, including no fewer than three impeachment attempts.
So, your claim above notwithstanding, is bunk. |
