SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : LOCK (Saf-T-Lok)
LOCK 23.990.0%Feb 16 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Milk who wrote (420)2/8/1998 2:19:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee  Read Replies (1) of 1039
 
If we compare the Quantum Groups' press releases vs Gardner's feeble rebuttal, we can easily discern:

1. Quantum posts very concrete, specific numbers that are indisputable. Massive insider selling, private placements to enrich shameless touts and the powerful threat of Smith and Wessons, the gun safety lock devices of which are 9 to 10 times less expensive than LOCK's.

2. Gardner's rebuttal, on the other hand, never addresses any of those Quantum numbers, and by doing so, quietly admits the correctness of all the figures posted by Quantum. Most everything Gardner says is very vague, general and ambiguous, in an obvious, and perhaps last-ditched, attempt to elude accountability and to temporarily prolong an all too transparent pump and dump ploy during its very sunset.

I traded LOCK several times in the past, including once recently, on the long side with success but never, never imagine anyone would be ignorant enough to see it as an investment grade stock.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext