Just on the face of what's presented, most stocks are going to be immediately rejected by readers -- no interest in the business or sector, not priced low enough, too many business issues, no history, etc. No further discussion necessary. There's not much wasted time in pondering these decisions.
In order for this "reader rejection" to occur, the person who brings up the stock should discuss the business or sector, the price valuation, the business issues, the history, etc. Right? That's my point.
Bring up a stock with zero information about the business / sector / relative valuation.......and especially without mentioning what the company does, is a complete waste of time. Right?
Lots of ideas is fine, but there's gotta be some meat in the idea. |
