Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mr.Staya who wrote (8606)	2/8/1998 6:09:00 PM
From: Marshall	Read Replies (1) of 14627

Good Post Ric; I definitely don't see Barrick just up and walking from the property- why should they. If they decide they do not want to mine it then they will just put their 70% on the market - can't they do this?? - I assume PFG has first right of first refusal in this case and vice versa. Also I fail to believe Barrick do not have expertise in Silver mining as I think they will be mining a considerable amount of silver annually especially when Arequipa starts production and if they don't have the expertise now they'll just buy it. Excellent point, Dave, it certainly would have been a dead giveaway if Barrick had to acquire these properties instead of PFG. Goodluck everyone

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next