SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: didjuneau who wrote (759085)3/11/2022 6:56:37 PM
From: didjuneau1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pheilman_

  Read Replies (1) of 793670
 
Glen Greenwald explains: There's no difference between bio-research and bio-weapons development as far as the lab is concerned. The "out" is the motive. They are allowed to excuse dangerous pathogen development if they call it "threat defense" according to the international biological weapons treaty.

This is a long discussion with the 2001 anthrax attack on the US as an example. It was used as an "unintentional"(????) false flag to get us into the Iraq war. Conveniently, after the fact of the entry into the war, it was determined that it was a Fort Detrick army researcher who had done it and erased himself from any further questioning and prosecution. But the FBI was certain it was him....

citizenfreepress.com

So of course, it wasn't the US that broke the treaty in this case. It was a rogue researcher acting on his own. Sorry, Iraq. The fake news media made us do it.

Actually, I am sorry, if any Iraqis are reading this. We have a lot to fix here at home.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News