We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon
Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
So, you are saying a six Billion dollar Bribe had no effect and it was the victims lack of focus, not the skewing of free and open markets?
Intel already paid its dues to the various government regulators for their "crime." The FTC got their $2B, Neelie the Terrible got her $2B, and the Cuomo family got Intel to try and prop up their dreams of Albany becoming the next "Silicon Valley."
Meanwhile, if that "sIx bIlLiOn dOlLaR bRiBe" crippled AMD beyond recovery, then how did Lisa Su turn the company around? She did it by innovating, something that AMD up until her tenure failed to do since Opteron. Even you can't deny that.
Pat was part of the effort to hijack the market with Itanium, Intel's proprietary effort, Intel's failed effort that was headed up by Gelsinger.
Wrong. Gelsinger was in charge of Intel's Data Center Group, which included Xeon and Itanium. Gelsinger was in charge when Intel decided to adopt x86-64. By then, Intel's plans to "hIjAcK tHe mArKeT" with Itanium were ancient history.
Now, his plan is to advance four manufacturing nodes in three years. That is what he needs to do to catch up with TSMC.
LOL, you probably think TSMC' s "3nm" manufacturing process actually means their transistors are 3nm in size. That's a commonly-held misconception by the anti-Intel trolls.
Many Intel longs hope is for China to invade Taiwan.
Wow, you're even more nuts than I thought.
Time to party like it's 1999 again, huh Mr. AMDroid?
