2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 389.05

+0.4%

Dec 10 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (186064)	4/7/2022 8:19:20 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) of 218358

TJ without any intent to insult you, but Li use in batteries is already passé - there are other chemistries that are cheaper and contain more energy per kg than Li-Ion. You are invited to read my various posts on LinkedIn to get some update for example to so called "glass batteries" which are still a much debated subject, or aluminum or zinc or iron etc., and much more. One link for you as an example why Li is at the end of wide use linkedin.com and another example of other chemistry I think is quite smart linkedin.com Unfortunate it may be difficult to understand for you as you forgot what I learned long ago and you need specific knowledge also of chemistry In 1989 I already proposed the use of Li batteries to OPCO and intended to buy the then TADIRAN Li batteries facility near Rehoboth in Israel when still in NYC. Tadiran refused without a general investment in the company itself by OPCO See the OPCO letter at this site slideshare.net As a general remark do you have any idea how many scientists in the world where thinking Li batteries at that time?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next