SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: didjuneau who wrote (761468)4/17/2022 9:17:44 PM
From: skinowski5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
Hoa Hao
kckip
lightshipsailor
MulhollandDrive

  Read Replies (1) of 793709
 
Just watched a long interview of Gen. Jack Keane by Mark Levin. The general is upset that the help to Ukraine isn’t as aggressive as it should be. He wants all sorts of super duper weapons sent there, ASAP.

I would like to ask the General a question - why not stop knocking around the bush - and just send NATO troops into Ukraine?
Likely answer - because it will be an intervention, and Russia will use nukes.
Next question (mine) What makes you think that Russia won’t do the same thing if Ukraine, using those super weapons would be destroying the Russians?

I think the answer is obvious - yes, they would. So….. here we have a respected 4 star General give a lengthy interview without mentioning even once that nukes even exist. Even though he indirectly implies that NATO entering the war would cause Russia to use them.

What on this green earth makes him so confident that at some point such excessive inflow of weapons would not become equivalent to a direct intervention? Could it be that he prefers to cover up certain possibilities? Could it be that he can’t walk and chew gum? Very, very strange.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext