| | | The damning first dose vaccine data known as early as May 2021
Sonia Elijah
Author at Trial Site News | Investigative journalist and broadcaster
Apr. 23, 2022, 8:00 p.m.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics. It is the executive office of the UK Statistics Authority, responsible for safeguarding the production and publication of official statistics which serve the public good.
The February release of the ONS data on all deaths by vaccination status between 1 January, 2021 and 31 December, 2021, is disturbing. Looking at the data taken from table 4 of the ONS report, it reveals the monthly age-standardised mortality rates, per100,000 person-years in England for the unvaccinated and the vaccinated (after 21 days of the first dose of a Covid vaccine). The age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), as defined by the WHO, 'is a weighted average of the age-specific mortality rates per 100 000 persons, where the weights are the proportions of persons in the corresponding age groups.' ASMRs are used to allow for comparisons to be made between populations which contain different overall population sizes and proportions of people of different ages. More importantly, it eliminates age as a confounding factor.
From early May 2021, the age-standardised mortality rate of the vaccinated population overtook the unvaccinated at a staggering rate and only a month later- the death rate amongst the vaccinated was shockingly four times higher.
A UK doctor who wishes to remain anonymous brought this to my attention and compiled the graph above, depicting the ONS data.
Around the time of this report's release, I had the opportunity to interview Prof Norman Fenton for Trial Site News, regarding a controversial paper which he co-wrote, entitled 'Official mortality data for England suggest systematic miscategorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination.' The paper was an in-depth analysis of an earlier report by the ONS.
The authors concluded 'the vaccines do not reduce all-cause mortality, but rather produce genuine spikes in all-cause mortality shortly after vaccination.'
It does appear the alarming data in this ONS report confirms the authors' January 2022 conclusions. Furthermore, if you take a look at table 12, it breaks down all deaths by vaccination status and age group.
What immediately stands out is the number of deaths in the older vaccinated groups, which jump significantly 21 days or more after the second dose. In the 80-89 age group, the death count is 2.5 times more than the unvaccinated and for the 90+ it's 2.6 times more.
Going back to that pivotal time in May 2021, when the ASMR of those who had taken their first dose overtook those who were unvaccinated- shouldn't alarm bells have started ringing then? Instead, any debate that Covid vaccines may cause injury or death was shut down and dissenting voices were censored, which continues to this day. The following month, all over 18s in the UK were offered their first dose of a Covid vaccine and by April 2022, children aged 5-11 were offered the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, almost an entire year after the damning data was known by the ONS.
If the purpose of the ONS is to 'serve the public good'- it has cataclysmically fallen short.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics. It is the executive office of the UK Statistics Authority, responsible for safeguarding the production and publication of official statistics which serve the public good.
The February release of the ONS data on all deaths by vaccination status between 1 January, 2021 and 31 December, 2021, is disturbing. Looking at the data taken from table 4 of the ONS report, it reveals the monthly age-standardised mortality rates, per100,000 person-years in England for the unvaccinated and the vaccinated (after 21 days of the first dose of a Covid vaccine). The age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), as defined by the WHO, 'is a weighted average of the age-specific mortality rates per 100 000 persons, where the weights are the proportions of persons in the corresponding age groups.' ASMRs are used to allow for comparisons to be made between populations which contain different overall population sizes and proportions of people of different ages. More importantly, it eliminates age as a confounding factor. |
|
