SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
D. Long
To: D. Long who wrote (759436)4/25/2022 8:11:08 PM
From: sm1th1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 793670
 
but let there be no mistake: this is a situation where there are no good guys. Ukraine is utterly corrupt.

The good news is that we may have found a situation where we can be happy that both sides CAN lose.
During the Iraq-Iran war Kissinger said "why can't they both lose?"

A variation of that is the best solution for this conflict. Ukraine has already lost <10% of population to exile, most will not return. The industrial infrastructure is largely gone and the farmers will miss a planting season. The economy is destroyed and the western "supporters" will lose interest when the shooting stops. The territory lost in 2014 is unlikely to be the only loss. The best scenario for Ukraine is still a big loss.
For Russia, they have spent $billions with little to show for it and their non-nuclear forces exposed as worthless. They will suffer economic losses both from the sanctions and the departure of most western businesses. Russia is unlikely to regain its status as a near equal to UAS and China, it has also already lost.

The best we can hope for is that the shooting stops relatively soon.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext