The Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (234778)	4/29/2022 11:25:59 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 358178

>> Issues like the propriety of Z's grants already have a vehicle for solution. There are state governments where it occurred that have Trumpy leadership and investigative bodies to deal with any illegalities that may have occurred. It's their jurisdiction. I just have to LMAO at this. Ten years ago Democrats were apoplectic over Citizens United allowing contributions to campaigns from corporate donors. The reason given was that the money harms the election process. Makes it unfair. Today, those same Democrats are claiming it is proper for a person -- through a corporate entity -- to drop 1/2 billion dollars into a campaign as he/she sees fit. In the case of CU it wasn't corrupt. In the case Z it is corrupt. It seems Democrats prefer CORRUPT MONEY over CLEAN money.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next