SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Terry Maloney who wrote (24610)5/3/2022 11:07:05 AM
From: h_2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
teevee

  Read Replies (1) of 37826
 
That question is a non sequitur, but the answer is no. You're only digging yourself deeper by quoting wikipedia, but that reveals even more than "scientific consensus" regarding your naivete. If you need to search for consensus, then your science has not reached a supportable conclusion. It is then no longer science, but opinion. Science has no room for opinions. Maybe in the deranged extreme leftist world, they'd like to believe it does so that they can twist their interpretations of science for their agenda, but in reality, science doesn't deal in opinion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News