SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: golfer72 who wrote (1357333)5/4/2022 1:54:55 PM
From: Land Shark1 Recommendation

Recommended By
sylvester80

  Read Replies (2) of 1573571
 
The current Roe framework is aligned with the scientific position on when a fetus becomes a person (i.e. in the 3rd trimester and is when the State can regulate abortions). In the 3rd trimester it's possible that the infant is viable on its' own. In the second trimester the State can regulate procedure.

In the first trimester, abortion is solely at the discretion of the woman and her doctor. Banning any abortions (no exceptions) at this stage is valuing the life of the fetus over that of the mother. A non-viable fetus has more rights than the mother. The state is controlling her body. This is not a right to life. This is a control issue. It's aging republican men (4 out of 5 of the supreme court judges), deciding that a woman shouldn't have the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News