I'll give you one thing, you have a consistent style (which unfortunately doesn't make up for lack of substance) with a 3-line title with a bold "or" in the middle, followed by two stanzas of one sentence per line, one in standard type, the latter in italics. I'm not sure what this is meant to convey as it seems to have no purpose. You probably think it lends gravitas to your mindless rants, but let me assure you nobody is buying that. I note again that your "rant mode" is not switchable.
Pointing out "data summaries" by the authorities who admit they would never allow "vaccine hesitancy" caused by the truth being printed, is not proof of vaccine efficacy or safety; it's merely regurgitation of propaganda. The data speak for themselves as they should.
You keep reiterating the "stark, really stark" age adjusted mortality for the "unvaccinated" vs the triple "vaccinated" but I haven't seen a reference for this claim. I can, however, easily refute your claim in the "Outcomes by Vax 1" tab at the BC CDC site where the "Age-standardized Hospitalization, Critical Care & Death Rates, BC, Apr. 03 - Apr. 30" chart makes it quite obvious that the normalized death rates graphed for non-jabbed, double and triple are all within their error bars of each other.
I.e., there is no benefit whatsoever from being jabbed either twice or three times with respect to deaths. And this only takes into account deaths that were tested positive for Covid at time of death. Those that died quickly from the booster (such as the 70+ data are clearly showing is a major problem currently) are not all reflected because some would not have had time to generate sufficient bioweapon spike proteins from their gene therapy injections to register a positive.
So try to tell me again how a jab that in only eight months has collected 30 years' worth of total fatalities and maimings reported in VAERS for all vaccines is a good risk for absolutely no statistically significant reward? And this time, show some actual data, not narrative reinforcing propaganda in the face of statistics showing the exact opposite.
Don't get jabbed, don't get boosted, for your health's sake and especially your children's, since they are at no significant risk from Covid but at significant risk of adverse events that may last a lifetime (which could be extremely short due to the jab.) |
