SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: violetta martinez who wrote (3838)2/9/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: John Fairchild  Read Replies (2) of 7966
 
I think todays selling was a result of Kaisers flip flop on K6 (following the last release). Lots of people were looking at the minibulk results on this and this alone IMO.

Now onto K91. I am still unsure of how these results were intended to be read (or was the answer given and I missed it?).

Results from analysis by dense media separation of
core from the four holes (0.85 tonne) display a high degree of
variability between holes. The best results were obtained from
hole K-91-1, where 0.287 carat was recovered from a sample of 0.21
tonne, for an indicated content of 136 carats per 100 tonnes. The
average indicated diamond content in material taken from the four
holes is 35 carats per 100 tones. Although these results are
derived from very small samples, they confirm the presence of a
population of larger stones and point to the need for collection
of a larger sample.

The table quotes an indication of 35.4 carats per 100 tonnes for stones greater than .8 mm for the 850 kg sample. Does this also mean that the 210 kg sample (best results) indication of 136 carats per 100 tonnes is also based on .8 mm macro cut off?

They should have been clear on these and many other points. I guess we will know the details better once the analyst have time to extract the information and present it in a user friendly format.

John

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext