Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (762696)	5/11/2022 7:23:28 AM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) of 793845

OK, I get it: Destroying Serbia and Libya were NATO defensive wars of convenience. The US Army fighting against Hitler was morally the same as Finland fighting WITH Hitler Finland didn’t want to attack Leningrad during WWII - German Nazis didn’t either - but both partners proceeded to starve its civilian population to death. Which, I suppose, somehow justifies Finland’s current decision to break their post war agreements. “Weakening” - meaning, trying to destroy Russia - is the “declared” policy of Nato since Gen Austen said so. All the preceding decades of the same were never openly declared, and ascribed to Russian paranoia. Sorry if I’m missing anything. Let me say something - I would personally fight (even at my age) for your right to freedom of speech. Upsets me far less than what I see on TV… Which is also protected speech, I suppose.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next