I watched 2000 Mules last night. It makes a persuasive case for major election fraud in 2020. Most documentaries are persuasive. So are most lawyers. That's why I never trust either one. I recommend you do the same.

That said, the alleged "debunk" of the film is nothing but handwaving. What should we think about a claim with no credible pushback and is massively censored by the alleged guilty team? A reasonable assumption under these circumstances is that the movie's claims are valid.

To be clear, no court has ruled the 2020 election had substantial fraud. But lacking FULL election transparency, a responsible citizen can assume fraud because all the signals are there.